ЛИТЕРАТУРА И ДОКУМЕНТЫ
ВВЕДЕНИЕ
1. Science and engineering indicators 1988. National science board. – Wash., 1998.
2. Stewart Welcome to revolution. In: Information age anthology, part 1. – The information and communications revolution, chapter 1. http://www.ndu.edu/ndu/inss/books/ anthology 1/ ch.01.html3. Science and engineering indicators 2000. National science board. – Wash., 2000.
4. Bonvillian W.B. Science at a crossroads. Technology in society. – N.Y. etc, 2002. – Vol. 24, N 1 / 2. – P. 27-38.
5. Rai L.P., Lal K. Indicators of the information revolution. Technology in society. – Vol. 22. – 2000. – P. 221-235.
6. Авдулов А.Н. (авт.-сост.). Реф. сб. Современные информационные технологии и общество. – М.: ИНИОН, 2002.
7. Наука и высокие технологии в России на рубеже третьего тысячелетия. – М.: Наука, 2001.
РАЗДЕЛ I
1. Science and engineering Indicators. 2000, rational Science Board. – Wash., 2000. – Chapter 2, 7.
2. Rescher N. Scientific progress: A philosophical essay on the economics of research in natural science. – Oxford, 1978. – XIV, 278 p.
3. Наука России в цифрах. Статистический сборник. – Москва: ЦИСН, 2000. – 143 с.
4. Fusfeld P., Haklisch С. Cooperative R & D for competitors. Horvard Bus.Rev. – Boston, 1985. – Vol.30, N 6. – p.4-1-1.
5. Авдулов A.Н., Кулькин А.М. Власть, наука, общество. Система государственной поддержки научно-технической деятельности: Опыт США. – М.: ИНИОН РАН, 1994. – 284 с.
6. Making America work again: jobs, small business and the international challenge. The national comission on jobs and small business. – Wash., 1987. – 126 p.
7. Авдулов А.Н., Кулькин А.М. Научные и технологические парки, технополисы и регионы науки. – М.: ИНИОН РАН, 1992. – l66 с.
8. Sunman H. (ed.) Science parks and the growth of technology-based enterprises. CSP Publication Ltd, Cardiff, 1987, 114 p.
9. Trends in small companies R & D expenditures. National science foundation – Wash., 1984. – 23 P.
10. Hanson Stein and Moor. Industrial innovation in the US, survey of 600 companies. – Boston, MA., 1984. – 130 p.
11. Ежедневный бюллетень "Европа". – 2 января 2002. – № 1222.
РАЗДЕЛ II
1. George F.H. After 1984: Prospects for a better world. – Tenbrindg Wells: Abacus press, 1984.
2. Science and engineering indicators. 1998. National science board. – Wash.: Gov.print.off., 1998.
3. Science and engineering indicators 2000. National science board. – Wash.; Gov.print.off., 2000.
4. Science and engineering indicators 2002. National science board. – Wash.; Gov.print.off., 2002.
5. И.Р.Гасликова, Л.М.Гохберг. Информационные технологии в Рос-сии. – М.: ЦИСН, 2001.
6. Keen P. Every manager's guide to information technology. 2nd ed. – Boston: Harvard Business school press, 1995.
7. Alberts D., Papp D. and Kemp W. The technologies of the information revolution. http://www.ndu.edu/ndu/inss/books/anthology1/ch03.html
8. Наука России в цифрах, 2000. – М.: ЦИСН, 2000.
9. Наука России в цифрах, 2002. – М.: ЦИСН, 2002.
10. Stewart T. Welcome to the revolution. In: Information age anthology. Part one – The information and communication revolution, chapter 1.
11. Nefiodow L.A. Europas chancen im computer-zeitalter. – Munchen: Kindler, 1984.
12. Balkhausen D. Electronik – Angst... und die Charicen der dritten industriellen Revolution.- Dusseldorf, Wien: Econ. 1983.
РАЗДЕЛ III.
1. The new technology development paradigm.
http://www.state.pa.us/PA-Exec/DCED/tech 21/6-paradigm.htm. Last updated April 01, 1998. – 4 p.
2. Авдулов А.Н. Наука и производство: век интеграции (США, За-падная Европа, Япония). – М.: Наука, 1992.
3. Bonvillian W.B. Science at crossroads. Technology in society. N 4 etc. – 2002. – Vol. 24, N 1/2. – P. 27–39.
4. Science and engineering indicators-2002, National science board. – Wash., U.S. Government printing office, 2002.
5. Vonortas N.S. Technology policy in the United States and the Europe-an Union: shifting orientation towards technology users // Science and public policy. – Guildford, 2000. – Vol. 27, N 2. – P.97–108.
6. Gusmao R. Research networks as a means of European integration. Technology in society. – Pergamon, Vol. 23, N 3. Aug. 2001. – P. 383–393.
РАЗДЕЛ IV
1. Авдулов А.Н., Кулькин А.М. Структура и динамика научно-технического потенциала России. – М.: УРСС, 1996. – 320, с. 2.
2. Fusfeld H.I. Technical Enterprise: present and future patterns. – Cam-bridge (Mass), 1986. – P. 304.
3. Российские вести. – № 38 (462). – 3 марта 1994. – С. 15.
4. Поиск. – № 8(718). – 28.02.03.
5. Устав Российской академии наук. – М., 1992. – С. 5, п. 8.
6. Подробнее об этом см.: Авдулов А.Н., Кулькин А.М. Власть, нау-ка, общество. Система государственной поддержки научно-технической деятельности: опыт США. – М.: ИНИОН РАН, 1994. – 284 с.
7. Арапов М.В. Наука и высшая школа. В кн: Авдулов А.Н., Кулькин А.М. Структура и динамика научно-технического потенциала России. – М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 1996. – 320 с.
8. Постановление Президиума РАН № 305 от 22 октября 2002 г. «О подготовке докторов наук в научных организациях РАН».
9. Хромов Г. Российская академия наук: история, мифы и реальность // Отечественные записки. – 2002, № 7. – С 210-215.
10. Беленький И.Л. Этос русской науки, ее национально-культурная топика. (Препринт). – М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2004. – 20 с.
РАЗДЕЛ V
1. Авдулов А.Н., Кулькин А.М. Структура и динамика научно-технического потенциала России. – М.: УРСС, 1996. – 320 с.
2. Авдулов А.Н., Кулькин А.М. Системы государственной поддержки научно-технической деятельности в России и США: процессы и основные этапы их формирования. – М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2003. – 80 с.
3. Келле В.Ж. Инновационная система России. – М.: УРСС, 2003. – 147 с.
4. Ракитов А.И. Наука, технология, культура в контексте глобальных трансформаций и перспективы устойчивого развития России // Наука, технология, культура (глобальный процесс и проблемы России). – М.: 1999. – 222 с.
5. National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators. – 1998, Wash.,U.S. Government printing office, 1998.
6. National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators. – 2000.., U.S. Government printing office, 2000.
7. Boylan V.G. The sources of technological innovations. – In: Research technological change and economic analysis.
Lexington (Mass.), Toronto, 1977, p. 103-129.
8. Mansfield E. Determinants of the speed of application of new technol-ogy. – IN: Science and technology in economic growth. London; Basingstoke, 1973, p. 199-216.
9. Merrifield B. Nurturing the innovator. – Research management, N.Y., 1979, vol. 22, N 6, p. 12-14.
10. Robbins M.D., Burke C.A., Milliken J.G. The technological innovation process in the private sector. – In: Technological innovation: The ex-perimental R & D incentives program. Boulder (Col.), 1977, p. 73-82.
11. Ettlie J.E., Vellenga D.B. The adoption time period for some transpor-tation innovation. – Management science, Providence, 19789, vol. 25, N 5, p. 429-443.
12. Gee S. Factors effecting the innovation time-period. – Research man-agement, N.Y., 1978, vol. 21, N 1, p. 37-42.
13. Goldhar J.D., Bragaw L.K., Schwartz J.H. Information flows, man-agement styles and technological innovation. – IEEE transactions on engineering management, N.Y., 1976, vol. EM-23, N 1, p. 51-62.
14. Souder W.E., Chakrabarti A.K. Industrial innovations: A demograph-ical analysis. – IEEE transactions on engineering management. N.Y., 1979, vol. EM-26, N 4, p. 101-109.
15. Udell G.G., Hawkins D.I. Corporate policies and procedures for evalu-ating unsolicited product ideas. – Research management, N.Y., 1978, vol. 21, N 6, p. 24-28.
16. White W. The research survey – a way to bridge gap between lab and market. – Research management, N.Y., 1978, vol. 21, N 4, p. 14-18.
17. Utterback J.M. Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. – Science, Wash., 1974, Febr. 15, vol. 183, N 4125, p. 620-626.
18. Kennedy G., Thirwall A. Surveys in applied economics: technical pro-gress. – Econ. j., L., 1972, vol.82, N 325, p. 11-72.
19. Mowery D., Rosenberg N. The influence of market demand upon inno-vations: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. – Research policy, Amsterdam, 1979, vol. 8, N 2, p. 102-153.
20. Pavitt K., Walker W. Government policies towards industrial innova-tion: a review. – Research policy, Amsterdam, 1976, vol. 5, N 1, p. 11-97.
21. Rosenberg N. Science, invention and economic growth. – Econ. j., L., 1974, vol. 84, N 33, p. 90-108.
22. Noyce R.N. Innovation: the fruit of success. – Technology rev., Cam-bridge (Mass.) 1978, vol. 80, N 4, p. 24-27.
23. Hippel E. von. A Customer-active paradigm for industrial product idea generation. – In: Industrial innovation: Technology, policy, diffusion. L., 1979, p. 82-110.
24. Factors influencing innovation success at the project level / Rubenstein A.H., Chakrabarti A.K., J’Keefe R.D. et al. – Research management, N.Y., 1976, vol. 19, N 3, p. 15-20.
25. Myers S., Sweezy E.E. Why innovations falter and fail: a study of 200 cases. – In: Technological innovation: The Experimental R & D incen-tives program. Boulder (Col.), 1977, p. 85-99.
26. Rubenstein A.H., Ettlie J.E. Innovation among suppliers to automobile manufacturers: an exploratory study of barriers and facilitators. – R & D management, Oxford, 1979, vol. 9, N 2, p. 65-76.
27. Abernathy W.H., Utterback J.M. Patterns of industrial innovation. – Technology rev., Cambridge (Mass.), 1978, vol. 80, N 7, p. 41-47.
28. Utterback J.V. Roduct and process innovation in a changing competi-tive environment. – In: Industrial innovation : Technology, policy, diffusion. L., 1979, p. 135-147.
29. Leibowitz A.H. Government policy and innovation: the Small business administration experience. – In: Technological innovation: The exper-imental R & D incentives program. Boulder (Col.), 1977, p. 290-298.
30. Policies for the stimulation of industrial innovation: Analytical rep. – P., 1978. – (Doc. / OECD). – Vol.1. 167 p.
31. Technological innovation: The experimental R & D incentives program / Ed. by Cunningham D.E. et al. – Boulder (Col.): Westview press, 1977. – XI, 494 p. – (Westview spec. studies in science a. technology). – Bibliogr.: p. 487-494.
32. Wolek F.W. Co-operative research and development in the United States. – In: Industrial innovation: Technology, policy, diffusion. L., 1979, p. 151-160.
33. Baruch J.J. The role of industrial R & D in new government programs. – Research management, N.Y., 1978, vol. 21, N 5, p. 12-16.
34. Prager D.J. Omenn G.S. Research, innovation and university-industry linkages. – Science, Wash., 1980, Jan. 25, vol. 207, N 4429, p. 379-384.
35. Wade N. Carter plan to spur industrial innovation. – Science, Wash., 1979, Nov. 16, vol. 206, N 4420, p. 800-801.
36. Weinschel B.). Why we need to renew the United States technology innovation effort. – IEEE transactions on industry applications, N.Y., 1979, vol. IA-15, N 2, p. 117-120.
37. Manners G.E., Nason H.K. The decline in industrial research – causes and cures. – Research management, N.Y., 1978, vol. 21, N 5, p. 8-11.
38. Nason H.K. The environment for industrial innovation in the United States. – In: Technological innovation: government-industry coopera-tion. N.Y. etc., 1979, p. 69-79.
39. Lederman L.L. Federal policies and practices related to R & D / inno-vation. – Research management, N.Y., 1978, vol. 21, N 3, p. 18-20.
40. Lederman L.L. Government policy and innovation in the United States. – In: Technological innovation: government-industry coop-eration. N.Y. etc., 1979, p. 159-164.
41. Research and innovation in the modern corporation / By.K Mansfield E., Rapoport J., Schnee J. et al. – N.Y.: Norton, 1971. –– X, 239 p.
42. Paolillo J.G., Brown W.B. Now organizational factors affect R and D innovation. – Research management, N.Y., 1978, vol. 21, N 2, p. 12-15.
43. Paolillo J.G., Brown W.B. A multivariate approach to perceived inno-vation in R & D subsystems. – IEEE transactions on engineering man-agement, N.Y., 1979, vol. EM-26, N 2, p. 36-39.
44. Stumpe W. No ivory tower. – Industr. research, Chicago, 1978, vol. 20, N 3, p. 106-109.
45. Haas W.J. Improving the external environment. – Research manage-ment, N.Y., 1979, vol. 22, N 6, p. 31-34.
46. Kottcamp E.H., Rushton B.M. Improving the corporate environment. – Research management, N.Y., 1979, vol. 22, N 6, p. 19-22.
47. Meechan Ch.J. The problem of a changing business environment. – Research management, N.Y., 1979, vol. 22, N 6, p. 35-38.
48. Roberts E.B. Organizational approaches. – Research management, N.Y., 1979, vol. 22, 6, p. 26-30.
49. Sarett L.H. The innovative spirit in an industrial setting. – Research management, N.Y., 1979, vol. 22, N 6, p. 15-18.
50. Lehr L.W. The role of top management. – Research management, N.Y., 1979, vol. 22, N 6, p. 23-25.
51. Aneja A.P., Aneja V.P. The strategy of process translation. – Research management, N.Y., 1977, vol. 20, p. 37-40.
52. Biller A.D., Stahley E.S. Understanding the conflicts between R & D and other groups. – Research management, N.Y., 1975, vol. 18, N 5, p. 16-21.
53. Fogg C.D. The market-directed product development process. – Re-search management, N.Y., 1977, vol. 20, N 5, p. 25-32.
54. Roberts E.B., Frohman A.L. Strategies for improving research utiliza-tion. – Technology rev., Cambridge (Mass.), 1978, vol. 80, N 5, p. 32-39.
55. White W. Effective transfer of technology from research to develop-ment. – Research management, N.Y., 1977, vol. 20, N 3, p. 30-34.
56. Нанотехнология в ближайшем десятилетии. Прогноз направления исследований. – М.: Мир, 2002.
РАЗДЕЛ VI
1. Pooly E. Too – good to be true? – Time, 1997, vol.149. № 20, May 19.
2. Bonvillian W.B. Science at a crossroads. Technology in society. – NY etc, 2002, vol. 24, № ?, p. 27-38.
3. Unlocking our future. Toward a new national science policy. A report to Congress by the House committee on Science, September 24, 1998. – http: // www. house. gov. / science / science_ policy_report. html
4. Making America work again: jobs, small business and international challenge. – National commission on jobs and small business, Wash., D.C., 1987.
5. Innovation in small firms. – Small business administration, Wash., D.C., 1991.
6. Наука России в цифрах 2000. – М., ЦИСН, 2000.
7. Science and engineering indicators. 2000. – Wash., gov. print. off., 2002.
8. Подготовка научных кадров в системе высшего образования Рос-сии. – М., ИНИОН РАН, 2002.
РАЗДЕЛ VII
1. Ferdinand P. Many layers building a super soldier. – Washington Post.-Wash.; 2003. – Jan.20. – P. A21.
2. Federal supercomputer programs and policies: Hearing before the Subcomm. on energy development a. applications a. subcomm. on science, research and technology of the Comm. on science a. technology, House of Representatives, 99 Congr. 1st sess., June 10, 1985. – Wash.: Gov. print. off., 1986. – P. 44-52, 82-84, 470-581.
3. Science a. Engineering Indicators, 2002. – Nat. science board.- Wash.: Gov. print. off., 2002. Chap.8.
4. Berkowitz B. Warfare in the information age. In: Information age an-thology, chap. 19, http://www.ndu.edu./ndu/inss/books/anthology1/ch19.html
|